bolha.us is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
We're a Brazilian IT Community. We love IT/DevOps/Cloud, but we also love to talk about life, the universe, and more. | Nós somos uma comunidade de TI Brasileira, gostamos de Dev/DevOps/Cloud e mais!

Server stats:

248
active users

#employee

1 post1 participant0 posts today
Continued thread

Bringing that up here because I heard someone has a case against its former employer because of the money talk.

The employer shields itself saying it "brought discourse, uneasiness and hostility to the employees environment". Contract stipulates salary as non-disclosable.

The employee says, it's null and void to censor an employee speech about his salary, or employment conditions, inside the business.

Who would win?

#Legal#Job#Jobs

I stand by my former boss Rule 7 for his business:

7. Money talk is prohibited with risk of firing.

Why? He told me (paraphrasing a lot):

"Talking about money can bring the worst from your people. Once someone feels its being mistreated or unfairly paid, it can be demoralising at best, but also destructive or hostile at worst. Sadly, firing him always solves the problem and sets the example for the rest."

#Job#Jobs#Working

'At the height of the #BlackLivesMatter movement back in 2020, #Google publicly said it would aim to increase “leadership representation of underrepresented groups” by 30 percent [....]. Now that ending #DEI programs across #America has become a top priority of the #Trump administration, Google says in the #employee memo that it’s “carefully evaluating” other DEI initiatives across the company that “raise risk” or “aren’t as impactful as we’d hoped.”'
theverge.com/google/607012/goo

The Verge · Google tells employees why it’s ending DEI hiring goalsBy Alex Heath