Daniel Fischer<p>Nothing to see here ... but we have a 50-meter <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/asteroid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>asteroid</span></a> right now with a probability of 1:83 to <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/impact" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>impact</span></a> Earth in 2032 and cause an explosion with an energy comparable to the <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/Tunguska" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Tunguska</span></a> event: watch the page <a href="https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/details.html#?des=2024%20YR4" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/deta</span><span class="invisible">ils.html#?des=2024%20YR4</span></a> for the evolving assessment; when future astrometry eventually rules out an impact (as is the typical outcome of such cases) it will simply vanish.</p>