JdeBP<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.fixermark.com/@mark" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>mark</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://beige.party/@talia_christine" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>talia_christine</span></a></span> </p><p>As I've said elsewhere, this is the most judicially activist <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/SCOTUS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SCOTUS</span></a> in history. It has outright voided part of Art2§4 already, and neutered part of the 14th Amendment.</p><p>Everyone has this idea that they are textualists or originalists. But no originalist would have ignored <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/AlexanderHamilton" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AlexanderHamilton</span></a>'s Federalist 69.</p><p>They're judicial activists, happy to be erroneously viewed by everyone as entirely the opposite.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/USPolitics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USPolitics</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.scot/tags/ConstitutionalLaw" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ConstitutionalLaw</span></a></p>